----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Nossaman <RNossaman@KSCABLE.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: April 20, 2000 9:57 AM Subject: Re: pinz > >Hi Ron, > > No answers, but an observation, Yamaha's seem to have far less > >little hair line cracks at the bridge pins than other popular brand names. > >Is it related? > > > >Roger > > I've noticed that too, and it could very well be. I've wondered more than > once where the trade off is between PSI decrease of pin/wood contact area > and loss of integrity of the bridge cap from the bigger hole. I'm beginning > to suspect that the PSI loading is the more critical. Also, why brass. The > larger diameter is likely as not to be for increased stiffness of the > softer material, rather than preservation of the bridge cap. I'd guess > that's most likely to have been an unplanned side benefit, but it may have > been intentional too. So why brass? inherent lubricity? > > Ron N ---------------------------------------------- I was once told that brass was used as an attempt to reduce false beats. The idea was that the softer material would 'absorb' these. Didn't make sense to me then -- still doesn't. Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC