BULK

[Ron Nossaman]

>Chris although the purpose of the post was to see if Grammar Dad Nossaman 
>would catch my mispelling of 'superfluous' as "superfluerous" there really 
>wasn't a redundancy intended within those terms :-)...and there really isn't 
>one..is there?? :-^)
>Jim Bryant (FL)


Oh yea? Well, you caught me so good I didn't even know it. I don't do
spelling, I do spell checkers. Just keeping track of all these dumb puns is
hard enough for me.      8-)

Ron N