Mark, Thank you. One more thing, that I have not been answers, How was your feel about tuning pins tightness upon tuning the LU90 ? Elian ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Bolsius <markbolsius@optusnet.com.au> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 7:29 AM Subject: Re: Yamaha LU90 ...and other indonesian attrocities > G'day Roger and Elian et al > > We also had the LU-101 prior to the C108 here in Australia. The LU-101 was > a Japanese made product, as was the C108. > The C108 has now bee replaced by the LU90 and the LX110 (this is an LU90 in > a taller cabinet with legs...a small version cabinetwise of the U1) > > They still sound horrible and I am encouraged by your comments regarding > steam voicing, Roger, I look forward to trying it all soon....and yes the M1 > (and the M108) are superior instruments! > > As I remember it, the LU101 was introduced as a model below the M1 to > counter the prices of the Young Changs and Samicks that were only just > starting to make an impact here. > > Cheers > Mark Bolsius > Bolsius Piano Services > Canberra Australia > > ---------- > >From: owner-pianotech-digest@ptg.org (pianotech-digest) > >To: pianotech-digest@ptg.org > >Subject: pianotech-digest V1997 #2030 > >Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 3:50 PM > > > > > Here in Canada, we had the LU101 series, American assembled > >> from Japanese components. > >> Current model is a C108 , harsh, single felted, unvoiced hammers. After > >> steam voicing they sound very similar to the old (superior) M1's. After > >> voicing it becomes a nice entry level piano.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC