At 11:31 PM 3/12/99 EST, you wrote: >In a message dated 3/12/99 10:05:03 PM Central Standard Time, >nossaman@SOUTHWIND.NET writes: > ><< Please attempt to give me a reasonably cogent > and unemotional description of the tuning pattern that constitutes what you > (alone) chose to condemn as "Reverse Well". I don't see how you can hope to > interest anyone in your crusade if you can't define the problem in a > reasonable manner. I think it's time you either did so, or let it alone. By > the way, why is "Reverse" capitalized? >> > >It is the exact opposite of a true, Well-Tempered Tuning. > >Bill Bremmer RPT >Madison, Wisconsin > > Yet again, Bill, that's not an answer. It's not that easily dismissed. What is the "exact opposite" of a given temperament, a= -440? If there is no objective criteria for your negative assessment of temperaments other than your own, then say so. Don't hide behind capricious and arbitrary nomenclature as if it had any real substance if you can't outline a superficial definition of that substance. Please make an honest attempt to reasonably define your terms so I will have even a minimal understanding of what you are talking about. I'm asking for an understandable minimal definition of your term. I consider the request to be reasonable enough to warrant an honest attempt at an answer if you can generate one. I really would like to know. Ron
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC