This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment There is no Y2000 K bug either. Frank Weston wrote: > >Histeria and advertising have no logic, however. That is why many people > >think the millenium is in a month. I have over a year to plan MY welcome > >to the third millenium. > > It all depends on what calendar you use. If we stick with the original > Roman calendar, the third millenium would have begun on about 14 Jan 1247, > which would have saved us all a lot of argument now. Unfortunately Julius > Caesar and Pope Gregory got into the act and screwed everthing up and that's > not the end of it. Modern astronomers use the so called Common Era > Calendar. I quote from my research: > > "If you use the Gregorian Calendar and start the first millennium with the > year 1 AD then the third millennium begins with the year 2001 AD. But if you > use the Common Era Calendar, in which years are numbered -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, > ..., and you begin the first millennium with the year 0 CE then the third > millennium begins with the year 2000 CE. You have a choice. And if you opt > for the Common Era Calendar you no longer have to put up with the smug > assertion that "there was no year zero (so the new millennium begins in > 2001)". There was no year zero when Pope Gregory XIII introduced the > Gregorian Calendar in the 16th Century but there certainly is one now, and > the new millennium in the Common Era Calendar begins in 2000 CE." > > Further, there is no Y2.001K bug. > > Frank Weston ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mtodd.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 157 bytes Desc: Card for Matthew Todd Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/3f/e8/bb/53/mtodd.vcf ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC