Hi list. Recent reading and posts on the list has given me the impetus to try something out. I am normally rather conservative about attempting things I know are over my head, but I just couldnt resist. I have in the shop a Brother Hals Piano. Americans wont probably have heard of this, but Scandinavians know them well and they are not particularily popular amoung tech. It is a Danish make from around 1880, birdcage. Typical for the design, long sustain, weak tone. From middle C there are just 2 strings (unwound) down to the E below where 3 wound double string unisions take over before the bass bridge begins. The piano has ribs like every 2 inches or so. Lots of them. They are triangle shaped. That is they angle up to a point on the top. The soundboard is 8 mm thick, some small amount of crown (a straight edge taken across the top of the board, angled with the tenor bridge with strings off shows about 2 mm space at each end.) There are no cave-ins on the board anywhere. The stringing scale makes no use of halve gauges. Unwounds start at wire size 22 (2 unisions) then 21 for 2, then 20 for 2, then 19 for 2 and then starts spreading out ending up at 14 until the last three unisions finnally make use of a half gauge, 13.5. I wont get into the bass strings this time around. The board rose almost not at all when I took off the strings. So I thought like this. Lots of ribs... board has no cracks and has never been repaired... bridge shows almost no indentation from strings after all these years... piano had long sustain and weak tone above and beyond what overdampers can explain... little but some crown.......... This thing (soundboard) must be really stiff, so I decided to lower the plate and set string deflection at 0.5mm treble and 0.8 bass. (at low tension) And I decided to split the difference between each treble string gauge section and insert halve gauge sizes (18's over to 17.5's etc) to spread out the scale a bit. Not haveing a scaleing program, and this being just a first try at such I decided to just keep it real simple. I am pulling it up to pitch tommorrow so I will know how it sounds. What I am after with all this is to see if I have understood any of what I have read recently.. grin. It seems like there should be to some degree a predictability about the general sound quality based on the condition of the soundboard and bridge. My reading was in this case that the board was too stiff in relation to the scale, thereby all the long sustain and weak tones. The other conditions noted seemed to support this. The change in scaleing was simply gut feeling (I have almost no knowledge in regards to scaling) So anyone out there in the know, I would appreciate your comments. This is the first time I have conciously tired doing any thing else then duplicating the previously existing conditions, being content to fix soundboard and bridge cracks, and supplying the piano with new strings. So I would be very gratefull for feedback and critic' on this first simple step. Richard Brekne I.C.P.T.G. N.T.P.F. Bergen, Norway
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC