Billbrpt@AOL.COM wrote: > > > So, for anyone interested, here is my "honestly arrogant" set of figures for > tuning a guitar so that it will sound more beautiful than the usual way in ET: > > All values are read on Octave 4: > > E2: -4.0 A2: 0.0 D3: 2.0 G3: 4.0 B3: -2.0 E4: 0.0 > > You can also do a "Victorianized" version of it which is milder: > > E2: -2.0 A2: 0.0 D3: 1.0 G3: 2.0 B3: -1.0 E4: 0.0 > > Don't ask any questions or say it won't work, just do it! (and enjoy the > beautiful chords). > > Yours truly, > > Bill Bremmer RPT > Madison, Wisconsin An interesting and nicely written post Bill. I am puzzeled by this buisness of tuning a guitar tho. Not really knowing much about how they are built (tho I have played my share of country and bluegrass on them) I was under the impression that the "tuning" was part of the placement of the frets. Also, when you play a chromatic scale using one string the "tuning" is whatever the designer had decided it was. Combining this with off tuned singles (by the most recent tradition of tuning a guitar) cant change the influence of the fret layout. I wonder if such instruments built 2, 300 years ago and beyond were "tuned" in this way. Well, its all a bit off the piano tech subject line, but its food for thought anyways. Richard Brekne I.C.P.T.G. N.T.P.F. Bergen, Norway
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC