>Dear Ron, >I'm sure the folks at Inventronics, or Dean Reyburn, would be happy to >start writing the code when your check for the first 2000 hours of their >billable time clears their bank account. > >Until then ... we should be grateful for the amazing tools we've already >been supplied with. > >Patrick > Patrick, >Is it worth the trouble for the available market? Obviously not, but like >the other twenty billion wished for gadgets in the same category, it could >be interesting and informative. You seem to have inadvertently clipped out the part of my post that already said the same thing you are so helpfully pointing out. %-) And the whole point is that there aren't 2000 hours of time involved here to do the graph display I described. It would greatly surprise me if it couldn't be roughed in in a couple of hours, and finished within a couple of days. Also, being grateful for what's already available to us shouldn't necessarily preclude the possibility of enhancements (if you can call them that), should it? If the state of the art in any discipline didn't occasionally move, we'd still be whacking bunny rabbits with tree branches for lunch. PS: Inventronics doesn't figure in here since they don't have a pixellated display for the graph. Ron
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC