Hi Jim, I think we have here a typical misubderstanding between two languages, plus the fact that you are American and I am not. Actually my use of the word sappy is a literal translation of my word "sappig". When I personally use the word "sappig" to describe a bass, than a few other images and descriptions come to my mind : juicy, rich like a ripe and delicious fruit, mature.... And of course a good Steinway has all that plus the possibility of "thunder" or, as you mentioned " >To the contrary, I like a bass that can (optionally) be driven into distortion. I hope that with this explanation I have made myself more clear in my feeble English attempt. Antares >Thanks for your candid opinion, Antares. However, of all the things one >might say about S&S, I've never considered 'sappy' bass as a descriptor >that would cross my mind. To the contrary, I like a bass that can >(optionally) be driven into distortion. > > > >At 06:45 PM 4/1/99 +0200, you wrote: >>treble too glassy, the bass not as sappy as a wonderful Steinway. > > >Jim Harvey >Greenwood, SC >harvey@greenwood.net >________ >The box said 'Win95, NT, or better', so I used Linux >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC