---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Direct Interval tuning by measuring the cents width of intervals or by matching up coincident partials when tuning octaves is MORE ACCURATE than any pre-computed tuning, whether it be a stretch chart, FAC, or whatever. I'd sure like to see the computer that can make judgements whereby moving one note a little sharp or flat improves some intervals while compromising others. No such computer or computations from one does or ever will replace the human ear. Basically stated, the direct interval tuning method is aural tuning with a little more cents (sense) feedback from the piano! james turner wrote: > For Jim Coleman > > Hi Jim, > > Some have mentioned the direct interval tuning method lately with the > SAT ll. I have not heard you discuss this method before. In your > opinion, how does this compare to the FAC method? Is the direct > interval method more accurate? > > Thanks, > > James Turner ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/3a/dc/b1/c4/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC