Reyburn CyberTuner (long)

[Michel Lachance]

Keith A. McGavern wrote:
> 
> >...I think it doesn't matter what kind of electronic device is used as
> >long as yo
> >u know that you can do a GOOD job of tuning without the aid of the device if
> >needed...
> >Greg Torres
> >Tunapiana@aol.com
> 
> Your comment humorously triggered something I once said in the past to a
> customer while on location.  Rather than using the SAT II, I mentioned I
> could use a tuning fork and tune aurally if they wanted, but I would charge
> more, it would take longer, and I wouldn't tune as well.
> 
> Guess which method the customer chose.
> 
> On another note I find it very amusing a new field of debate is developing,
> RCT vs SAT.  Wasn't it just yesterday it was, SAT vs Aural.  Just got to be
> something I guess, to defend and/or support as one being better than the
> other.  Thank goodness for diversity.
> 
> And so it goes...(tks, KV)
> 

I think that the RCT vs SAT debate concerns only the FAC calculation  
against Chameleon 2.  Since you can easily tranfer any tuning from one 
to the another, they can be very close friends.


Michel Lachance, RPT