Refinishing: HLVP vs Conventional Systems

[Frank Weston]

BSHARPTUNE@aol.com wrote:
> 
> I am wondering if anyone has done any plate or cabinet refinishing with one
> on the HVLP systems.  My refinisher uses a Binks gun with compressor-says
> that the HVLP's are ok but not that great....although his experience with
> them has been very limited.  A friend who does autobody refinishing thinks
> they're great!  Hence, the controversy.  I would like some feedback from
> anyone has used the HVLP system with any success.  Mention make, model, any
> other particulars that you may think important!
> 

Devlon,

I do a lot of work both with HVLP systems and conventional systems. 
There are pros and cons for each setup.

HVLP is much more efficient in the use of material
HVLP operates in a way such that water does not condense in the line
HVLP seems to resist "blush" in lacquers better than conventional
systems
HVLP is much lighter and more portable
HVLP is quieter
HVLP puts less overspray and vapor into the air

on the other hand

With a conventional system of sufficient size, air tools can be operated
It is less expensive to buy a HVLP gun for use with and existing
conventional system than it is to buy a full HVLP system
Accessories for a conventional system may be less expensive.  It costs
about $120 to change orifice sizes with HVLP
It is much easier and cheaper to use a remote material pot with a
conventional system

If I were starting without an existing system, I would choose HVLP.  If
I already had a large compressor system, I might choose a compressor
type HVLP gun.  Binks is the Steinway of conventional guns.  I use a
Graco HVLP system and am very satisfied with it.  Before you choose a
HVLP system check out the range, availability and cost of accessories. 
Some systems offer much better choices than others in this area.

Hope this helps,

Frank Weston