Avery: From your discription of the S&S M hammer line I picture a blocked line rather than a curved one. From others responding to you it is apparent that changing the hammer line, or curving the hammer line is sometimes done to improve tone. I service an S&S L, owned by a music club. It is about 10 years old. It loses volume and brilliance in the 5th and 6th octaves. It is improved when I slide the action out 1/8 inch, which hurts the top octave, so I would like to start a slow curve somewhere in the 4th octave and end it in the last part of the 6th octave. I doubt if even a technnician would notice the curve unless it was looked for. Then I would like to follow that with hammer treatment in tenor and treble to give t the brilliance a Steinway ought to have. Not sure the committee will let me. Also, service an L, for a concert class pianist. Piano age similar to the one above. Only shaped and treated the hammers for her and it made a world of difference in the dynamic range. She was really pleased. Not sure a hammer line modification would have added anything. (These 2 Ls are in different cities so not easy to get the good word from the satisfied customer to the club's committee). Hope this is of some use to you. Good luck. Travis Avery Todd wrote: > > List, > > I just picked up the action from a Steinway M #526486 (1994, I think) > that has had hammers reglued (9) closer to the flange. The notes are F# 5 > thru D6. I was just wondering if anyone had ever run across one of this > age which needed a curved hammer line. The previous tech didn't curve it. > He just moved those 9 hammers app. 3/16" in on the shanks. Supposedly to > improve the tone right there. > > > _____________________________________ > Avery Todd > Moores School of Music > University of Houston > Houston, TX 77204-4893 > atodd@uh.edu > _____________________________________ > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC