Dianne Salem wrote: > >> I am working on a Steinway Model D that was rebuilt by another technician > >> about 2 years ago. The middle treble rear duplex has been shimmed up by > >> just over 1/16". I wonder if anybody has had any experience doing this and > >> if so, what would indicate the necessity for this, and what were the > >> effects both positive and potentially negative... Also, duplex bar in the > >> raised section is not aligned at all properly, i.e. 4 strings up on one > >> aliquot, 2 on the next, one down, 3 up, etc. This will be realigned, but > >> would like some input on the shim at the same time... > >> > >> There is a very "dead" section in this piano (Octave 4) that none of the > >> obvious has remedied -- section just below the raised duplex section. This > >> is our concert instrument here, so any input on these matters would be > >> greatly appreciated! > >Questions: > > > >What work was done to it during its "rebuild" and how old is the piano? > > > >--ddf > Thank you so much for your reply to my SOS. Serial Number of this Steinway > D is 379845. I don't have my atlas with me here, but I believe that would > place it at about 1963. This piano has original bridges, soundboard and > pinblock. Sound board and plate were refinished, and piano was restrung. > Action was rebuilt with all Steinway parts. OK. Now I’ll say it—I’ve seen all of the duplex bars in Steinway grands shimmed up at one time or another. Including some on a few new pianos that were put there at the factory. It’s done to adjust for slightly excessive down bearing in that area. I’ve seen downbearing measurements ranging from slightly negative to 2 plus degrees in pianos from this era. You’ll have to check downbearing through this section to determine whether or not to leave the shims in place. As far as I’m concerned, there is nothing really wrong with this practice. If the down bearing is excessive, it’s a good way of relieving some of it without having to pull the plate. With one 1960’s vintage D we rebuilt a couple of years back, we found so much bearing on the board that we had to raise the plate height somewhat and shim up the aliquot bars. In fact you’ll need to check downbearing throughout the scale. Once you know what you have for a string load on the soundboard, you’ll have at least some idea as to how to proceed. I’d guess that the plate was lowered a bit to pick up some bearing elsewhere, but you’ll have to measure to be sure. You might also want to crawl underneath and check soundboard crown. (Let me know what you find.) Now for the (potential) bad news. I’m assuming that you’ve already checked the condition of the hammers to be sure that they’re reasonably well shaped and not been overly needled. (What kind of hammers are on the piano? Steinway?) Actually, you need to be sure that they’ve not been first over-shaped and over-lacquered and then over-needled as is the practice of some with problem Steinways. If you can assure yourself that this is not the case, then you may be looking at a new soundboard to really fix the problem. The range from the fourth through the sixth octave is a particularly troublesome one in the D and it’s basically a soundboard problem. Generally sustain drops off first and then the hammer voicing merry-go-round starts. Unfortunately, if this is a soundboard problem, no amount of hammer voicing is going to cure it. Well, check everything else first. —ddf
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC