Insensitivety

[Robert S. Bussell]

At 09:41 AM 3/7/96 -0700, you wrote:
>My apologies, I see that I have offended some by making unkind remarks about
>anothers level of competence.  As a new subscriber to this newsgroop, I had
>guessed that a few of the questions that I responded to were fictious in
>order to evoke certain responses, perhaps humorous or otherwise, and to spur
>discussion. It is true that the only stupid question is one that is not
>asked, and I certainly have asked my share. (Except, some of the questions
>really are dumb...)   I'M ONLY KIDDING!  Lighten up you guys.
>
Lisa,

I personally was not offended by your remarks, and you are right I did
intend to spur on discussion, serious discussion. Thank you for your
enlightened contribution.

However I was surprised to see so little response to such a controversial
subject.  I do have an understanding of proper "accepted" regulation methods
but sometimes we must throw these aside to get the immediate job done.  I
was first introduced to unusual procedures "privately" by Loyd Whitcomb when
I attended Yamaha's Little red schoolhouse in 1987. I at first thought he
was joking but since then I heard from concert technicians who also in
certain instances used this method. I had thought that this forum would be a
proper place to explore all the aspects of this "living on the edge"
methodology.

Thank you Bob Davis, Vince, and Jim Harvey for your contributions

Bob,
Robert S. Bussell RPT
Indianapolis In.
rbussell@iquest.net