Keith/group,
I'd like to use this reply a bridge to another current thread --
hence the subject change. These thoughts are mine, and are
'interdenominational' in scope.
I don't have the threads handy. They'd be too long anyway. To
summarize, there are several messages regarding what is modified
on a piano (keys, hammers, actions) by technicians; versus what
is considered acceptable under terms of warranty by
manufacturers; versus what is considered potential breaches of
warranty.
I feel more at liberty to speak to this as a *former*
manufacturer's representive than perhaps those who's tax
withholding is presently done for them.
Consider that most manufacturer's technical representatives are
desk jockies who are trying to diagnose and resolve a given
situation over the telephone. Their only input is what they are
being told (and sometimes what is not being said) by the person
on the other end of the line. When a given problem is reported,
they go down a (mental or otherwise) checklist of what
circumstances cause a given phenomenon. Their responses are based
on composite knowledge of *many* examples of a given, but
otherwise *stock* product.
If a product has been modified, it skews and complicates the
diagnostics process, and can result in negative relations
between manufacturers, dealers, technicians and owners. In this
case, we'll use this handy example of stringing braid,
regardless of how innocent it may appear to be.
I have been the desk jockey, trying to diagnose/remedy what was
called "strange noises", "ghosting", or other unofficial
descriptors. Other times, I've tried to resolve situations
involving tuning instability, where customary causes have been
explored and eliminated.
In some instances, the actual cause turned out to be where
someone had removed the stringing braid from all or part of the
taped sections. In all of my cases, the owner was unaware that
their instrument had been modified. Sometimes mods had been made
arbitrarily by a prior technician. Other times it originated at
the dealership, prior to the piano ever being sold. It was later
found that on at least one dealer's store, the braid was being
removed on a wholesale basis -- from every piano on the floor,
without regard to warranty or ramifications. The dealer
*personally* preferred the results.
In addition to making diagnostics more difficult, I maintain that
some instruments, in spite of appearances, were not designed to
support duplexing. More importantly, there are owners who are not
ready for the phenomenon of duplexing, whether by design or
modification, and regardess of the opinions of others.
My point? We're all aware that any operation performed on a piano
will effect some other area, positively or otherwise. Because of
this, we have the responsibility of not only observing (as Keith
has done here), but discussing certain matters with our clients,
even if it means using a *lot* of words, prior to making changes
to otherwise "stock" instruments.
Slightly off topic, but in my pipe dreams, I've always wished for
a reliable method of tracking what is done to pianos -- a device
whereby a technician could annotate items of significance to any
that follow, and something that would stay *with* the piano
forever. Japanese pianos created for [their] domestic sales have
the "tuning" card holder tacked to the side of the case. A
variation of this would qualify for the tracking method I have in
mind. Too bad this is not OEM equipment for all pianos. Of
course, any tracking method can be abused.
Thanks for your tolerance/Jim Harvey RPT
_________________________ Reply Separator ______________________
Based on what you indicated, it seems to me that someone could change the
voice on these particular instruments to some degree by removing all or
parts of the stringing braid.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC