Somebody wrote: "I once went to visit a tuner friend and interrupted him while tuning his piano with a SAT. He used a Papps mute throughout . . . Never once did any checks. He finished tuning the piano and invited me to check it out. I did and it was horrible . . . I was obviously skeptical about the method he used . . . Where are the checks?" I have two comments: 1. The tool (SAT) is only as good as the person's ability using it. It's the same with any other tool. With the SAT you first have to understand the 3 FAC stretch numbers and how to correctly measure and store them into the machine. It's not always best to use the "literal values" that you measure. And you've first got to be able to measure them correctly. When tuning JUST stopping the lights is probably the worst way to use the SAT tool. Stopping the lights gets you in the ballpark, but your ears and GOOD tuning hammer techniques will put it where it should be so it will stay. Which brings me to my second comment: 2. The checks should be occurring "as you go" (from A0 to C8). I check octaves, double octaves, 4ths, 5ths, progressive 10ths and 17ths through the bass - as I go. I finish with aural checks over the entire scale when I'm through. I use the tests and checks I have learned that work best for me. When I'm through I make sure the piano sounds MUSICAL and the unisons are clean. I don't get complaints. I lied. I have three comments. 3. It upsets me that some are using the SAT strictly as a "light stopping device." Yes, this tooner is giving us and the SAT a bad name, not to mention the unhappy, disappointed customers he/she leaves behind. Dave Swartz said it best when he posted something to the effect: "ears and the SAT - the best of BOTH worlds." Regards, John Piesik
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC