Most recertification programs are not exacty the same exam as what was required to be certified in the first place. That is practical. If and when PTG expanded the testing program in this way somehow, there are lots of questions about details that must sorted out, but not at all insurmountable. It just won't happen on this list. IMHO, there is far more to gain than lose but clearly some will resist at every step. Dennis Johnson Sent from my iPhone On Jul 26, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Israel Stein <custos3 at comcast.net> wrote: > OK, Y'all > > Talk is cheap. The most useless thing anyone can do is sit around > and come up with ideas - for other people to put into action. Sounds > nice - give classes with a test at the end. The only problems are: > > 1. Someone has to make up these tests and keep revising them to deal > with issues that inevitably come up. > 2. These tests have to meet the legal standards set by US anti-trust > law for certifications issued by Trade Associations such as the PTG. > Which makes developing, refining and revising these tests a very > laborious and time-consuming affair. > > Ain't gonna happen until we start paying people for their time spent > on developing and administering exams - because on the "volunteer > driven organization" model that we insist on clinging to, we are > currently operating at capacity. Hell, beyond capacity... You can't > imagine how much time and effort it takes just keeping up with the > issues on the current exams... > > Then there's the question of where the money will come from - since > not a whole lot of people are willing to pay the costs of exams now, > when the labor is free (and with the current fee structure, the exam > fees don't pay the entire cost of the program). > > Israel Stein -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100727/7731c95b/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC