[CAUT] using as ETD

Elwood Doss edoss at utm.edu
Mon Apr 12 09:13:35 MDT 2010


The Aural vs. ETD debate is on!  No one's mind will  be changed.  Gotta
go tune a practice room piano.

Joy!

Elwood

 

Rev. Elwood Doss, Jr., M. Mus. Ed., RPT

Piano Technician/Technical Director

Department of Music

355 Clement Hall

University of Tennessee at Martin

Martin, TN 38237

Office: 731/881-1852

Fax: 731/881-7415

Cell: 731/479-4043

 

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of
Dennis Johnson
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 9:49 AM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [CAUT] using as ETD

 

To all this I can add that many times in the past while doing master
tunings "by committee" for the PTG exam we would get consensus for
certain notes in the treble so everyone was happy, then I would measure
the octave and point out the SAT suggests it might be smoother if we
nudged it a little this or that.  I would make the adjustment then ask
if it's better or worse. 
Not always, but more times than not we all agreed the adjustment was an
improvement.  

This is part of our normal routine now for tweaking master tunings,
especially in the extreme treble, and I guess I consider that  proof of
the observation below. 

best,

Dennis Johnson

__________________

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu> wrote:

Wim, Paul,

 

I agree. I tuned aurally for about 20  years then about 12 years ago I
bought a SAT. Hated it, for about a month anyway. Then, (and I REALLY
don't want to start this ETD vs. aural debate!!), I measured my aural
tunings and examined where some discrepancies were, and found that more
often than not I actually agreed with the ETD. Sure, I'm confident that
my aural tunings are solid, but my opinion is this; nearly every ETD
tuning can be enhanced by good aural listening/tweaking, and every aural
tuning can be smoothed out or improved by careful examination using an
ETD. So there. I said it. 

 

Don Mannino did an excellent class about tuning and showed a graph of
the same piano with his best aural tuning and then with an ETD.
Different. The ETD curve was smoother and nearly perfect, whereas the
aural curve was "bumpy". Was one better? I dunno. Don seemed to agree
that both are good, especially combined, and that an ETD is only another
tool in our box.

 

I do know that sometimes when I've only got one nerve left and there's
lots of noise around where I'm tuning that my ETD has probably saved the
lives of many custodians and small children...

 

Jim Busby BYU

 

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of
tnrwim at aol.com
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 10:02 PM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: [CAUT] using as ETD, was Re: Too tall!!??

 

 

	hey Jeff..I'm strictly aural, so your message, though helpful to
some, is all Greek to me.  Someday, I'll fall to the great gadgets out
there. 
	
	thanks 
	Paul 


Paul

 

I would highly recommend you get yourself a gadget. I can almost
guarantee that it will greatly reduce your stress level. You might even
be able to tune all the pianos you want to tune very week, and still
have time to do the repairs you so desperately need to take care of. 

 

About 20 years ago, my wife, who had been using a SAT, had to stop
tuning because of a bad elbow. I had been an aural tuner up until then.
I didn't want that $1200 gadget to sit on a shelve, so I decided to
start using it. Almost immediately I could feel my stress level go down.
In the past, every fall, between church and work, I was a total stressed
out wreck by the time Christmas came around. But the year I used the
SAT, I actually enjoyed Christmas. 

 

I know it sounds like a lot of money, and there is a learning curve, but
trust me, it will be one of the best investments you'll ever make, and
you'll be so happy you got one. 

 

Wim

Wim 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul T Williams <pwilliams4 at unlnotes.unl.edu>
To: Jeff Tanner <tannertuner at bellsouth.net>; caut at ptg.org
Sent: Fri, Apr 9, 2010 9:24 am
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Too tall!!??

hey Jeff..I'm strictly aural, so your message, though helpful to some,
is all Greek to me.  Someday, I'll fall to the great gadgets out there. 

thanks 
Paul 



From: 

"Jeff Tanner" <tannertuner at bellsouth.net> 

To: 

<caut at ptg.org> 

Date: 

04/09/2010 01:43 PM 

Subject: 

Re: [CAUT] Too tall!!??

 

________________________________




Hi Paul, 
Been out of town, so I know I'm coming in late on this. If you have SAT
III (I don't know about IV), you can also experiment with the library
tunings for these two pianos, and not just a new FAC. Those would be
pages 135 (B) and 138 (D). The tunings that come from the factory were
calculated with the old mathematical curve used by SAT II, and you get
very different results -- usually less stretched -- than with a new FAC.

  
Another option is to use the F4 tuning function, which only calculates
from C3-F6, then match the bass and high treble aurally, or however
you'd like, and quite often your FAC will even work just fine. Good
chance that F4 of both pianos has a similar F4 stretch, but I don't have
any handy to check right now.  I often prefer the temperament of the
middle of the piano when I just use the F4 temperament, and because the
partials change at F#, rather than at the Cs, you're at the fundamental
at F#5-B5, which clears up the lights considerably through that section.

  
Other than these additional thoughts, I agree mostly with just tuning
them to their FACs and not worrying about it.  Too much experience with
expert musicians who can't hear the difference to worry about a cent or
two that only we will notice. I once did 6 Baldwin Hamiltons together
for a performance, that there wasn't time to actually syncronize their
tuning for. I thought they sounded horrible, but I was out of time. All
I heard were accolades about that. 
  
Jeff Tanner 
  
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Paul T Williams <mailto:pwilliams4 at unlnotes.unl.edu>  
To: CAUTlist <mailto:caut at ptg.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:24 PM 
Subject: [CAUT] Too tall!!?? 

Hi all. 

this is a new one for me.  The Liszt Fest has started here at UNL
through Saturday.  I just got a message from the stage manager. The
pianists say the piano is too tall! It's on a piano truck.  What would I
have them do....saw off a 1/2" of the legs? (LOL)   I'm thinking a half
inch base under the lyre and bench (although it's adjustable) and paint
them black. 

Also, on another note; How do you all like to tune two pianos together?
One venue has a Baldwin D and Steinway D together, the other venue has a
Steinway D and B to be tuned together on Friday (UGH!) I've done my
usual for the 2 9'-ers but; Any tips on the 9' and 7' together would be
great help.  I've never been happy with those two pianos together, but
that's my only choice. 

Thanks 
Paul 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100412/e369774b/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC