[CAUT] historic temp thoughts

Israel Stein custos3 at comcast.net
Mon Nov 30 19:38:51 MST 2009


Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:18:04 -0700 Fred Sturm <fssturm at unm.edu> wrote: 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

> Yes, the lute would most likely be fretted to ET (exceptions existed, 
> but seem to have been pretty rare). And it seems that lute and 
> harpsichord were used together, especially theorbo and harpsichord. 
> Yet the overwhelming bulk of evidence says that up to 1700 1/4 comma 
> MT was by far the predominant tuning for keyboards, throughout Europe 
> and especially Italy and France. So one has to assume they made do. As 
> for the recorder (and other woodwinds), the way they adapted 
> intonation was through a wide variety of alternate fingerings, 
> together with embouchure adjustment. 

Well, Fred, I don't know what you mean by "they made do", but there is plentiful evidence that when it came to tuning, at least in Italy, keyboards yielded to frets rather than the other way around. At least that's what the writings of Vincenzo Galilei - one of the foremost lutenists and theoreticians of the period (and Galileo's father) - suggest. In Monteverdi's operas (and I do see "Ninfa's lament" on the program) a very specific configuration of the orchestra is used to allow this. Monteverdi actually scored for two separate and distinct halves of the orchestra - one with fretted instruments (archlutes, theorbos and such) playing plucked continuo along with a harpsichord and an organ, with viols (fretted) in the string section and lots of lutes and guitars. This half of the orchestra - including the keyboards - was tuned in equal temperament. The other half of the orchestra used harp as the plucked continuo instrument - along with its own organ and harpsichord - and the violin family comprised the string section. This part of the orchestra was tuned in meantone. The two never play together - for obvious reasons. Which suggests to me that people went to great lengths to allow fretted instruments to play in ET - even when MT was desired in other contexts - and "compromised" the tuning of the other instruments, including keyboards... 

I was fortunate to participate in such a production of Monteverdi's Orfeo during the 1993 Boston Early Music Festival - under the direction of Andrew Parrot (English conductor and scholarly authority on the period - including Monteverdi) and with an international cast and orchestra. The fretted instrument section was led by Paul O'Dette (who played continuo on the archlute) - one of today's great virtuoso lutenists, an authority on the lute and DIrector of the Historical Performance program at Eastman. This is how they tuned the orchestra - frets in equal, unfretted in meantone. (I worked on the set and pumped the regal bellows for Andrew Lawrence King - the British harpist who doubled on the regal and tuned all the keyboard instruments - harpsichords, organs and regal - when the regular tuner wasn't available). So there is good authority to insist that equal temperament is appropriate (or even recommended) for Italian music of this period when fretted instruments are involved. 

Since you mentioned recorders and wind instruments, I have to say that renaissance and transitional (early baroque) recorders as well as shawms and curtals/dulcians ( I own a full consort of each) were typically pitched to be played in meantone, and to play in other temperaments it was necessary to leak or shade finger holes in addition to using alternate fingerings and embouchure games - all of which isn't such a big deal (ask me how I know). Sackbuts and trumpets of course have no finger holes - they depend on embouchure games and slides (yes Virginia, there was a slide trumpet) to control pitch and so have more flexibility (assuming they are not playing too low on the overtone series). The technique for controlling pitch on that other "brass" instrument of the period - the cornetto - involves selling one's soul to the devil, since getting anything resembling a predictable pitch out of those things (finger holes notwithstanding) appears to be impossible for folks who use solely human agency and the breathing mechanism they were born with... 

Israel Stein 






-------------- next part -------------- 
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... 
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091130/e77eccbb/attachment-0001.htm> 

------------------------------ 

Message: 2 
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:24:16 -0500 
From: "Ed Sutton" <ed440 at mindspring.com> 
To: <caut at ptg.org> 
Subject: Re: [CAUT] historic temp thoughts 
Message-ID: <D7E37890926E4BAA85985AFC1CDDA7E5 at EdPC> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" 

Gerry- 

It sounds like you have a group that is willing to take some responsibility for intonation. 
That should be fun. 
My experience playing lute with larger ensembles was that it mostly provided "chiff," so tuning wasn't so crucial. 

Ed 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: G Cousins 
To: CAUT 
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:27 PM 
Subject: Re: [CAUT] historic temp thoughts 


Ed, 
Continuo is with Archlute and Harpsichord. 
Professor (historical instrumentation/history PhD) is the lutenist/arch luteninst he's quite comfortable with historical tunings. 
We've been having the discussion. We've been hovering around a 1/4 comma MT adn it sounds as if that is the general concensus of the (CAUT) group. 
The ensemble has been working all semester toward this concert. I've been trying various temps to see what might fit best. They are a really good group and wiling to let me work with them. I do count my blessings. 
There are a few more practices before dress. Concert is Friday. 
GC 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
From: ed440 at mindspring.com 
To: caut at ptg.org 
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:05:37 -0500 
Subject: Re: [CAUT] historic temp thoughts 


Instrumentation? 
Lute and harpsichord together? 
It will take a very clever lutenist to approximate meantone, though it can sometimes be done. 
And most modern recorders are tuned in ET. 
I think it would be wonderful to find an ensemble willing to really work on these problems. 
es 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Fred Sturm 
To: caut at ptg.org 
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [CAUT] historic temp thoughts 


Standard tuning for that time and place would definitely be 1/4 comma mean tone. 
Regards, 
Fred Sturm 
University of New Mexico 
fssturm at unm.edu 




On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:50 AM, G Cousins wrote: 


Gang, 
One of our groups is performing a concert of "New" Italian music from late 16th and early17th centuries. 
Traditional instruments are being used. Viola da Gamba, Lute, Archlute, Recorder(s), Harpsichord continuo. 
I'm open to your thoughts on appropriate temperaments as this is looking to be lots of fun for all. 
Thanks in advance, 
Gerry Cousins 
WCUPA 

Program 
Sinfonia Seconda ? 4 con 2 Bassi.................. Johannes Kapsperger (1580 - 1651) 

Dolcissimo sospiro................................................... Giulio Caccini (1551 ? 1618) 
Gagliarda quarta........................................................... Anon. Neapolitan ca. 1620 
Gagliarda quinta............................................................ Anon Neapolitan ca. 1620 
Non pi? Guerra.......................................................................................... Caccini 
Con sorrisi cortesi......................................................... Jacopo Peri (1561 ? 1633) 
Amarilli mia bella....................................................................................... Cacinni 
Canzona la Francese............................ Giovanni da Macque (ca. 1548/50 - 1614) 
Intenerite voi, lacrime mie................................................................................ Peri 
Canzona V (solo instrument and basso seguente) Giovanni Gabrieli (ca.1555 ? 1612) 
Canzona quarta.......................................................................................... Gabrieli 
Lamento della Ninfa........................................ Claudio Monteverdi (1567 ? 1643) 
Ben pu? chi vuol?? Re giugner appreso................................................ Kapsperger 
Occhi gratie d?Amore........................................................................... Kapsperger 
Ballo Secondo: Uscita.......................................................................... Kapsperger 
Ballo Secondo: Ballo............................................................................ Kapsperger 
Corrente Terza...................................................................................... Kapsperger 
Veri diletti............................................................................................ Kapsperger 
Alma Redemptoris Mater........................ Giovanni Felice Sances (c. 1600 ? 1679) 
Jubliate Deo................................................... Giovanni Gabrieli (ca.1555 ? 1612) 









-------------- next part -------------- 
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... 
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091130/3061b133/attachment.htm> 

------------------------------ 

_______________________________________________ 
CAUT mailing list 
CAUT at ptg.org 
http://ptg.org/mailman/listinfo/caut 


End of CAUT Digest, Vol 13, Issue 123 
************************************* 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091201/0cea20d8/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC