David - I was just looking at some earlier today. I didn't have a chance to measure for any differences, but I suspect that, as part of an overall effort at mass and friction reduction they are rather significant in a couple of respects. While the finish may not be that much slicker than brass, initially, they will not tarnish, like brass. They are considerably lighter, and, for better, worse, or indifferent, the surface profile (curvature) is more acute than most. The rest would be for experience to tell. Their website is pretty informative. David Skolnik Hastings on Hudson, NY At 04:19 PM 11/29/2009, you wrote: >It's just a capstan that's made out of different material. I used >them on a capstan moving job awhile ago. I suppose they're a bit >lighter. Not a big deal or advantage over brass that I could really >tell. They do cost more. > >David Love >www.davidlovepianos.com > >From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf >Of David Ilvedson >Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:28 PM >To: pianotech at ptg.org; caut at ptg.org >Subject: [CAUT] WN&G capstans > >List, > >I'm interested in trying those new WN&G capstans. Has anyone >converted to a particular brand they fit with out too much trouble? > >David Ilvedson, RPT >Pacifica, CA 94044 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091129/5beff74b/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC