[CAUT] 1912 B: speaking lengths anyone?

Ron Nossaman rnossaman at cox.net
Fri Feb 27 11:07:47 PST 2009


Mark Cramer wrote:

> Regarding original and present MC, I don't disagree with Ron's suggestion,
> what else could it be? My feeling (and past experience) however is that this
> board is now at a lower MC than when it was ribbed (see below).   
> 
> Fortunately I'm not seeing the "S" or sine-wave deformation that we find on
> neglected boards and that Ron has described in past.

You wouldn't on an unloaded board, and otherwise dead boards 
(with strings on) don't always S curve in any case.
Ron N



More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC