[CAUT] professor tuning variables

Porritt, David dporritt at mail.smu.edu
Fri Feb 20 07:49:38 PST 2009


I've never done that but it sounds reasonable.  Remembering what temperament goes where is what computers and inventory databases are for.

dp

David M. Porritt, RPT
dporritt at smu.edu

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of G Cousins
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:35 AM
To: CAUT
Subject: [CAUT] professor tuning variables

Greetings all,
In light of the recent discussion(s) on the varied forms of tunings  ET,MT,Schubert ET, etc.
Has anyone ever tracked or patterned their tuning toward specific teachers needs and/or teaching preferences. More specifically, I am finding that if I vary my tuning temp toward the type of teacher, Piano performance, Voice, Chamber player etc.... the profs tend to prefer the "different sound" (read tonal difference) the piano has after this altered tuning.
Although I have not told any of them what I have been doing, I have just been doing what I think will better suite the teacher's piano after asking and analysis of their comments about the piano in their studio.  Pianos I "toying with" are L's, B's & 178's
I was wondering if anyone has ever done similar testing or experimentation in this area. YES, (John C.) I am well aware of the can-o-worms this might (and potentially can bring to an already taxed workload schedule. Eg:Trying to remember what temp goes where, what venue, room,teacher, yada,yada.
I'm just hoping for some thoughts and/or input from the list.
Gerry C
West Chester University of PA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090220/b9cc72bb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC