[CAUT] historic temp thoughts

Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu
Tue Dec 1 16:14:52 MST 2009


On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Israel Stein wrote:

> Sorry, Fred, it isn't quite that simple.


	You are right, Israel, it isn't that simple. For instance, one overly  
simple assumption is that the archlute is playing entirely in ET. This  
is probably true of the frets, but not necessarily of the long  
strings, which are commonly played as open strings for low,  
fundamental harmonic tones (on archlute and on theorbo). Hence the  
fretting isn't an issue, and they can be tuned to accommodate as  
needed - they can be tuned, if needed, to the corresponding notes on  
the harpsichord. Yes, this compromise puts the instrument somewhat out  
of tune with itself, but it solves a particular problem which is  
probably the most glaring one, if the archlute is serving a continuo  
function.
	For some contemporary writings about the relationship between fretted  
instruments and the harpsichord, I'd recommend reading Mark Lindley's  
Lutes, Viols and Temperaments. There are some very interesting  
comments from 16th and 17th century authors, most of which acknowledge  
the impossibility of the lute playing in tune with the harpsichord.  
Personally, I would interpret them as meaning that the harpsichord was  
not tuned to meet the lute. That is certainly Lindley's opinion. (Not  
to say that it was _never_ done, but that it would be rare).
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
fssturm at unm.edu





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091201/fdbaf806/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC