Ron Is this with a normal stroke, or a let off/drop check stroke? Wim -----Original Message----- From: Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> To: caut at ptg.org Sent: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 6:39 am Subject: Re: [CAUT] Another Baldwin Question/backchecks Paul T Williams wrote:? > > Hi All.? > > In regulating this Baldwin R I've been talking about. I'm narrowing in > (I hope) on a couple of issues hindering the regulation. I think the > backchecks are too high.? > > Does anyone have the specs on how high up from the back of the key the > backchecks should be? 1966 Baldwin R. The angle is also wrong, but I > have that information, but I think, since these are not original, they > were not installed deep enough into the key, or the wires from whatever > supply house were too long.? > > Any hints?? > > Thanks people!? > > Paul? ? With the key fully depressed, and the action in otherwise decent regulation, the top of the back check should be no higher than the end of the hammer tail, or a couple of millimeters below.? Ron N? ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090414/36aab9ad/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC