[CAUT] Another Baldwin Question/backchecks

[Paul T Williams]

So,

Just like Steinway?

Paul




Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> 
Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org
04/14/2009 11:40 AM
Please respond to
caut at ptg.org


To
caut at ptg.org
cc

Subject
Re: [CAUT] Another Baldwin Question/backchecks






Paul T Williams wrote:
> 
> Hi All.
> 
> In regulating this Baldwin R I've been talking about. I'm narrowing in 
> (I hope) on a couple of issues hindering the regulation.  I think the 
> backchecks are too high.
> 
> Does anyone have the specs on how high up from the back of the key the 
> backchecks should be?  1966 Baldwin R.  The angle is also wrong, but I 
> have that information, but I think, since these are not original, they 
> were not installed deep enough into the key, or the wires from whatever 
> supply house were too long.
> 
> Any hints?
> 
> Thanks people!
> 
> Paul


With the key fully depressed, and the action in otherwise 
decent regulation, the top of the back check should be no 
higher than the end of the hammer tail, or a couple of 
millimeters below.
Ron N


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090414/7b75f3d0/attachment-0001.html>