[CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists

Paul T Williams pwilliams4 at unlnotes.unl.edu
Thu Nov 20 11:45:15 PST 2008


Jim,

What is your juice ratio you now use with these new S&S hammers?

Paul




Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu> 
Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org
11/20/2008 12:05 PM
Please respond to
caut at ptg.org


To
"caut at ptg.org" <caut at ptg.org>
cc

Subject
Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists






Hi Dennis,
 
The voicing procedure today at the factory is vastly different than say 2 
years ago. I think you’d be surprised at how quickly the hammers can now 
be voiced/juiced. 
 
Last month I attended the Steinway Tone Building Seminar and came away 
with a few ideas I might share.
1.       I like now like Steinway hammers and the way they voice. 
(Previously, not so much)
2.       The hammers can be ready to play in three voicing sessions. The 
Steinway C&A guys do it all the time.
3.       They are now pre-juiced more than before. My understanding is 
that the pre-voicing consists of literally soaking the hammer in a tray. 
4.       You voice for two things “Body”, by applying MUCH less than 
before to the shoulders ( a few drops at a time) , and “Attack”, by adding 
only 3 drops at a time (3/1) to the crown.
5.       Single needle through the strings right in a “too bright” string 
mark
6.       More juice where needed as above.  Carefully listening, a drop 
here and there…
7.       Sand/mate, etc. etc. as before
 
They are using MUCH less juice in this stage than previously used because 
the hammers have far more in the factory -juicing phase. For instance, a 
small bottle (4 oz?) is now used which lasts through the whole procedure. 
We used to put 3 or 4 times that much, pouring it in!. Now it’s a matter 
of only a few drops at a time, judiciously applied.
 
Of course, trying to condense down the whole week into one small post 
can’t quite hit the mark, but these two things I want to stress; 1. I like 
it (didn’t before) and 2. A  much more surgical approach is taken. 
 
 
Hope that helps Dennis.
 
Jim Busby BYU
 
 
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of 
Dennis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:31 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists
 
Hi-

Some recent experiences lead me to inquire how others may deal with 
certain impatient expectations regarding tone building on new hammers, 
specifically S&S hammers that require extra juicing in the treble.  This 
is all standard procedure, but generally my experience shows that the best 
results are achieved not quickly but through a combination of playing in, 
hardeners and needles over a bit of time.  Unfortunately, the event 
calender rarely allows for optimal time.  Do you send a memo to everyone 
explaining all this?  I've had similar problems as related to instability 
on a newly restrung piano being required for certain events before it is 
ready. 

Thanks,   but having a bad day-

Dennis Johnson

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20081120/d51cf215/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC