On Nov 13, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Jeff Farris wrote: > I have seen several Steinway pianos with the bottom of the strut > filed at > the point where it crosses the bridge (and also at the curved area > inside > the "cut out" for the bass end of the bass bridge) to prevent > rubbing. Was > that "planned"? That could well be variation in casting. Blame Kelly <G>. At least until S&S bought them a few years back. Since when the quality of plates - agraffe spacing etc - has improved a great deal. Measuring the two Steinway grands I tuned this morning (and old A and an old M) I found clearance between strut and bridge top ranging from 8 mm treble to well over 15 mm tenor. Obviously this is under load and old, flat boards. Don't know where the board/bridge would have been when new and at top humidity. How much lowering of a bridge under string load is considered a "normal" range? I guess you have to specify at what RH/EMC. A second question would be how much will a soundboard not under load, but glued to a reasonably solid rim, move up and down (measured at bridge top in various locations) between, say, equilibrium at 10% RH and at 90% RH? Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC