[CAUT] Harpsichord transposing keyboard/ WT

[Jim Busby]

Got it. Thanks Avery!

Jim

________________________________
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Avery Todd
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:26 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Harpsichord transposing keyboard/ WT

Jim, I did a search and I "think" these are the ones.


C  5.87

C# 3.91

D  1.96

D# 3.91

E -1.96

F  7.82

F# 1.96

G  3.91

G# 3.91

A  0.00

A# 3.91

B  0.00

C  5.87
Avery Todd
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu<mailto:jim_busby at byu.edu>> wrote:

Fred, List,



I can't find the offsets for Bach/Lehman. Could someone post it? Rollingball doesn't seem to like me today.



Thanks,

Jim Busby



________________________________

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org<mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org> [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org<mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org>] On Behalf Of Fred Sturm
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 4:04 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Harpsichord transposing keyboard/ WT



Not Valotti-Young, as it has maybe even more key color than Werckmeister. Something more on the lines of Victorian. Lehman/Bach is a good suggestion along those lines. But really it would be better to do separate tunings at each pitch, or just do ET. I had a similar situation for the International Flute Society last summer, and they actually needed to use the same instrument at both pitches in the same concert. We settled on ET, after much back and forth about logistical issues (Eg couldn't we manage to have two instruments for that performance?)

Regards,

Fred Sturm

University of New Mexico

fssturm at unm.edu<mailto:fssturm at unm.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20080721/7b68bbcd/attachment.html