I don't see the problem...interesting items to CAUT will be conveyed to CAUT via those on both Lists... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA 94044 ----- Original message ---------------------------------------- From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman at cox.net> To: "College and University Technicians" <caut at ptg.org> Received: 7/11/2008 7:47:11 PM Subject: Re: [CAUT] Requirements for contributing/posting; RPT status >> Not incredible at all, Ron. >> There was a time when CAUTS (those that were on-line anyway) were the only >> ones who read Pianotech since it was the original CAUT list. >> It began as a shared set of e-mail addresses to which we all posted everything >> in the days before listservers. Danny L. Boone at Baylor was the one who got >> me involved. >> The only reason most we left one by one was that the volume of postings (and, >> indeed, the volume of what amounted to chatter) increased to the point that >> the time investment was too costly in terms of our workload and available >> time. >> If not for that, Pianotech would still be the CAUT list and we'd all still be >> there. >> I envy those who have the time to read Pianotech, almost as much as I envy >> those who have time to read both lists. >> Personally, though, the costs outweigh the benefits... politics >> notwithstanding. >Yea, that's what I read here. We don't have time to read >Pianotech, because it doesn't have anything we want anyway - >ascertained by not reading it. Very slick. I must learn how >that works some day. >This is also, incidentally, chatter. >Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC