[CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern

[Chris Solliday]

that's it in motion, and consequently has more weights and mass so "breakaway" is more dramatic.
Chris

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tim Geinert 
  To: College and University Technicians 
  Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 7:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern


  Chris,
  I would have to say more conventional.  But what is the difference?  Does "accelerated" make use of the idea that weights added closer to the balance rail add less inertia?
  tg
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Chris Solliday 
    To: College and University Technicians 
    Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:10 PM
    Subject: Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern


    sorry Tim I just reread your post and see that you too left in a basic pattern so I guess we are just about equal. Since yours was an accelerated weigh off made retarded, after you removed the back leading did you leave a more conventional weigh off pattern, or go with the accelerated pattern?
    Chris
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Tim Geinert 
      To: College and University Technicians 
      Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:10 PM
      Subject: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern


      List,
      Thought some of you might like to see these pics.   I just finished plugging over 400 holes(I know that key replacement should have been considered, but it is not possible for this customer), and that was after I left what I hope to be a basic starting weight pattern in the keys.  I just weighed the leads that came out.  To be honest, I was a little dissappointed  they only weighed 15 pounds.  Oh well.  I would be interested, though, to find out where that stands as far as bragging rights go.

      Oh.  The key weighing was part of an S&S "B" rebuilding 10 years ago that included Renner Blues on shanks with a 16mm pin to knuckle measurement, pinblock replacement without glueing it in or fitting it to the flange and also pushed the plate back to shorten #88 to about 46 mm, delignit block with VERY tight pins and coils 10 to 12 mm above plate.  This piano is just a joy!  :-(

      Back to the grindstone.

      Tim Geinert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20080108/8ef322a5/attachment.html