[CAUT] Voicing Steinway D

itunepiano at aol.com itunepiano at aol.com
Sat Jan 5 16:30:11 MST 2008


 The grooves are on the backside because the hammers have some wear and they were overstriking.     The lacquer I applied to the shoulders on the back of the hammers quickly soaked under the strike point.  The result was more power, more dynamic range, and a nice bell tone.   I was surprised because the front of the hammer is rock hard with lacquer, and the back appeared to have only what was applied at the factory.  There's still room for more lacquer in the back of the hammers, but the piano doesn't require it.  


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Love <davidlovepianos at comcast.net>
To: 'College and University Technicians' <caut at ptg.org>
Sent: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 6:10 pm
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Voicing Steinway D

























OK, not that it really matters as I agree
with Chris’s comment about where the lacquer should go (on the crown
between the strikepoint and the molding), but what does that prove exactly? 
Are the grooves on the backside because of a hard blow, soft blow or just a
blown boring job.  



 





 


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20080105/47164194/attachment.html 


More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC