Hi John, I've been thinking about what you wrote below and wonder if you just "think" the centers were still good or if you took out some hammers and measured grams or counted swings. Maybe "good" is our problem word. Steinway says "zero friction is still good as long as there is no side play"... If you agree then maybe that's where we diverge. If I can't get at around 3-5 grams the regulation suffers (IMO) and possibly tone as well. Fly away hammers, inability to set rep springs, etc. It drives me nuts! But of course, I'm half way nuts anyway. I'm always trying to find ways to prolong the life of everything in the piano, especially pinning. (I hate to pin) Maybe if you could find one of those pianos (below) we could dissect it and duplicate it. (Are you sure it wasn't some kind of verdigris? <G>) Regards, Jim -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of John Delacour Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:03 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] center pinning changes/ long pin method At 17:09 -0400 11/9/07, Jon Page wrote: >I presume frequent repinning is for heaqy-use pianos in an >institutional setting. I've seen professional pianos that have the ivory practically worn through to the wood and still good original centres. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC