[CAUT] My take on them, (was The "new" S&S Hammers).

Jeff Tanner jtanner at mozart.sc.edu
Fri Sep 14 11:32:39 MDT 2007


On Sep 14, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Paul T Williams wrote:

>
> It appears that a lot of y'all like the Ronsen Werzen's. Is the  
> difference between them and Brooks-Abel huge?  I haven't tried the  
> RW's, but now curious to try.  Before becoming a CAUT, I liked the  
> Renner Blues, but the Brooks/Abels won that battle pretty easily  
> (at least on Steinways I've done so far). Is the dynamic range  
> greater with RW's?  What lasts longer? How much time difference in  
> installing/voicing between the two?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul

I don't have any experience with the Ronsens.  But a while back,  
Roger Jolly had recommended them for replacement of the rocks on our  
Baldwin Ls in our practice rooms.  I called Pianotek to find out  
prices and when I explained what I was after, they told me that the  
Ronsen Werzens were definitely NOT what I was looking for if I didn't  
want to fight harsh tone in a practice room.  They said those hammers  
were very hard and I would be constantly needling them.

I still haven't gotten around to replacing them.  Got pushed down the  
priority list.  But its going to have to happen someday soon, either  
by me or somebody.  Those practice room hammers are about 13 years  
old now.

Jeff


Jeff Tanner, RPT
University of South Carolina



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070914/6ae06987/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC