ROLF !! Yeah... it wouldnt take very many slices to do the job. Seriously tho.. we got several interrelated tangents to the main thread going. I'm responding to the bit that has to do with what happens to the strings tension, frequency and downbearing force for a given change in how much it is deflected upwards. Its easy to figure this and provides one very interesting peice of information... namely how much resultant downbearing there is for a given change in string deflection. This can be used in comparison with what is reasonable for a soundboard to be able to do... both upwards and downwards in the face of resultant downbearing force for a given hypothetical deflection. I tend to agree with your last paragraph. I think I made a similar point a couple years ago relative to this notch edge crushing as a result of the bridge pins holding the string down while the bridge face is expanding.... part of the argumentation used then to refute that strings can climb bridge pins. This argumentation seems to have been backed off from quite a bit lately. Cheers RicB Oh, I thought the question at hand was whether the cutting of a groove into the bridge would cause a drop in pitch inbetween tunings. Let's see; with a 0.5mm drop of the string inbetween each tuning, the bridge cap would be cut in two in about 8 tunings. I agree with whoever suggested that the resistance of the board would lessen any impact of the groove on tension. Usually when things compact, they do so at a rate of 80% in the first 10% of the overall time frame so the groove lowering the pitch on a regular basis seems to me to be illogical. Keith
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC