[CAUT] Old Chickerings

[Kent Webb]

Hello All,

I happened to catch this thread and let me add
something I sometimes touch on in classes. 

We as technicians must be very careful about the
criteria by which we judge or recommend pianos. It is
not based on the ease of service but on the ability of
the piano to perform music. 

If a piano is more difficult to service we should
certainly charge accordingly. The benefits to the
pianist are worth it and the extra time and expertise
justify the costlier service. For comparison sake, I
feel sure that comparable work on a Ferrari costs more
than on a Chevy due to the parts and expertise
required but, knowing a few Ferrari owners, I never
hear them complain about the costs of service. They
just want the best performance possible and realize
that is what it takes to achieve this.

Kent Webb



--- Delwin D Fandrich <fandrich at pianobuilders.com>
wrote:

> Jim,
> 
> As usual you make some good points. I, also, am a
> fan of the small Chickerings
> and would like to add just one observation. 
> 
> While I have listened to many technicians criticize
> these pianos because they
> are designed somewhat differently and working on
> them takes a certain degree of
> creativity, it is rare to encounter an owner who
> does not love his or her
> Chickering Quarter Grand. It is rare to find an
> owner willing to part with one.
> 
> Del
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: caut-bounces at ptg.org
> [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On 
> | Behalf Of James Ellis
> | Sent: March 18, 2006 5:33 PM
> | To: caut at ptg.org
> | Subject: [CAUT] Old Chickerings
> | 
> | Let's not be quite so quick to bad-mouth those old
> 
> | Chickerings, the latest of which was a Quarter
> Grand.  Yes, 
> | the Quarter Grand was a fancy parlor grand, and a
> departure 
> | from the big heavy models of the 1900-1910 period.
>  
> | 
> | As for the dampers that screwed on and damper
> wires that were 
> | threaded on both ends - those were standard with
> Chickering 
> | for years.  Did anyone notice that those wires are
> straight, 
> | with no "dog-legs" to make the dampers line up?
> Those wippens 
> | and shanks at diverging angles, and those
> repetition lever 
> | springs that loop into silk cords on each end are
> a pain to 
> | regulate, but once you get them regulated, they
> provide 
> | repetition that's second to none.  There are other
> features 
> | that may seem strange to many of you, but if you
> will look 
> | more closely, you may see some logic to what
> Chickering did 
> | from time to time - those pinblocks that were
> integrated with 
> | the plate instead of the case, for example.
> | 
> | I own three 100-year-old Chickerings right now - a
> scale 116, 
> | a scale 119, and a scale 131 concert grand.  Those
> wooden 
> | action brackets have not swelled or shrunk one bit
> that I can 
> | tell, and the actions stay regulated.
> | They slide smoothly on the keybeds when the una
> corda is 
> | used, and do not knock, despite the fact that
> there are no 
> | glides in the key frames.
> | 
> | Jim Ellis
> | 
> | _______________________________________________
> | caut list info:
> https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> | 
> 
> 
>