On Jun 7, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Stan Kroeker wrote: > Fred, Mark, > > Employing the 'aural' method of water depth sensing, will the end > of trickling sound always result in a precise depth in the > reservoir? Of course, this depends on the length of tubing in the > reservoir but can you simply add a measured amount of water after > the sound stops? ie: trickling sound stops: add exactly one- > half litre more to bring level within 1 cm of top? Or ... perhaps > this measured amount could correlate to the moment the light stops > blinking? I just guesstimate an amount after the noise stops: x time pouring, and visual of how much is being added, looking at the can before and after. Based on experience. And check my experience with a finger in the tank, where there isn't an undercover. > > If this works (the reservoir would have to be perfectly level, of > course), you could simply mark a line on the watering can to > indicate the 'top-up' amount. How close to the top of the tank do > you dare to fill, Fred? About 2 cm, enough to get below the slot for the tube/probe assembly, plus a bit so it doesn't wick up through that hole. Dare? Heck, I once ran it clear to the top, not thinking about that little slot. And found that the water dripped out, so I wasn't ahead any <G>. What's a wee bit of water on the carpet in a faculty office? Nobody will ever notice. > > Regards, > > Stan Kroeker Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20060609/521b949e/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC