[CAUT] RE:O's & L's & A's

[Chris Solliday]

They're not ?!?!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Schneider" <schnei78@msu.edu>
To: "'College and University Technicians'" <caut@ptg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:36 AM
Subject: [CAUT] RE:O's & L's & A's


> You never know what to take seriously these days and what is ironic, but
to
> take the risk: What's so stupid about L's? I love L's, I love O's. I love
> 6'2" A's, but I love the 6'4" better (I take care of two and have rebuilt
> several) and wish Steinway was reintroducing that A, but they're not. I
> predict that after a discreet period of dissing L's, a legend will arise
> that they were the best, and the O will be under appreciated.
>
> Bill Schneider
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of
Susan
> Kline
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:58 PM
> To: College and University Technicians
> Subject: RE: [CAUT] who's got dibs??
>
> At 05:44 PM 1/30/2006 -0700, Guy wrote:
> >The L is outta "hear", and the O is back. Cool, huh?
> >
> >G
>
> and A's! They're making A's and O's, and the stupid L is
> goners! Did somebody in Long Island wake up, or something?
>
> Sometimes life is good -- momentarily.
>
> sssnn
>
> _______________________________________________
> caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
> _______________________________________________
> caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>