At 22:27 1/22/2006, you wrote: >I don’t agree with Roger, we’re not all equalat least not in innate >ability, and there are gender differences (thankfully). David Love ><mailto:davidlovepianos@comcast.net>davidlovepianos@comcast.net > >David, you make it sound as if the differences in innate ability are due >to gender differences. Innate ability has nothing to do with gender. I >agree with Jeanne that women are intimidated not to try as children >because the assumptions society forces on them makes it so difficult to >succeed. There are just as many women as men out there that can be a >complete technician. There are some physical differences such as upper >body strength and average size but they have nothing to do with whether or >not a person can figure out the adjustments on a piano action or voice a >hammer. My mother was 17 when she entered UC Berkeley and graduated in >three years, Phi Beta Kappa, a 3.95 grade average. She wanted to be an >engineer but that was not allowed in 1939. My Aunt Carol was the first >woman to be admitted to the med school she went to and became a physician >in 1952. I have heard complaints of the difficulty to get an education as >a piano technician, particularly for women. I assume this to be because it >is a male dominated mentor sort of education system that makes assumptions >about the innate ability of women and what they can or cannot do. Hey, get >me a cup of coffee. > >Keith Roberts ><mailto:kpiano@goldrush.com>kpiano@goldrush.com All of us are equal. It's just that some are more equal than others. (Apologies to Geo.Orwell.) If we _were_ all equal in every way, it sure would be boring. I do my best to keep folks around here from getting bored... ;-} Conrad Hoffsommer You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC