This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Unfortunately, you didn't read the entire statement or didn't read it carefully enough (is that a male thing?). The Kafkaesque direction that this dialogue is going forces me to clarify lest someone haul me before = the PC court based on your erroneous elaboration of my points. (Didn't' I = say this was a slippery slope.) Clearly the gender of any individual has nothing to do with their potential to become a piano technician, doctor, getting a 3.95 GPA, or even playing on the PGA tour-wow! I was simply saying that we (humanity-that includes men and women together as one = group) are not all born with the same innate abilities as our obsession with equality sometimes forces us to believe. In addition and separate from that, there are gender differences. How about that! There tend to be differences between men and women. Not a profound statement-or a sexist one, I might add. As in any statistical analysis, you can't draw conclusions about any one individual based on bell shaped curves or = standard deviations. It's just information. Unfortunately, information is too = often subject to misinterpretation. =20 David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of = Keith Roberts Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:16 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] Differences? =20 Sorry, that's the way I read it. =20 Keith ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David <mailto:davidlovepianos@comcast.net> Love=20 To: 'College and University <mailto:caut@ptg.org> Technicians'=20 Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:59 PM Subject: RE: [CAUT] Differences? =20 No, that's not what I said. We are not all equal. There are gender differences. Two separate statements. =20 David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of = Keith Roberts Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:27 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] Differences? =20 I don't agree with Roger, we're not all equal-at least not in innate ability, and there are gender differences (thankfully). David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 =20 David, you make it sound as if the differences in innate ability are due = to gender differences. Innate ability has nothing to do with gender. I = agree with Jeanne that women are intimidated not to try as children because = the assumptions society forces on them makes it so difficult to succeed. = There are just as many women as men out there that can be a complete = technician. There are some physical differences such as upper body strength and = average size but they have nothing to do with whether or not a person can figure = out the adjustments on a piano action or voice a hammer. My mother was 17 = when she entered UC Berkeley and graduated in three years, Phi Beta Kappa, a = 3.95 grade average. She wanted to be an engineer but that was not allowed in 1939. My Aunt Carol was the first woman to be admitted to the med school = she went to and became a physician in 1952. I have heard complaints of the difficulty to get an education as a piano technician, particularly for women. I assume this to be because it is a male dominated mentor sort of education system that makes assumptions about the innate ability of = women and what they can or cannot do. Hey, get me a cup of coffee. =20 Keith Roberts kpiano@goldrush.com=20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/bc/53/6e/5e/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC