I cant speak for any CFIII over there, but on the CFIII-S that we have this would be completely unneccesary and would just plain wreck the set of hammers. On our instrument the hammers need only moderate needling at any time... and that included the first voicing at the factory. Now if your instrument is an old CF and has rock hard hammers... well perhaps... if the guy knows what he's doing. In spite of all... I would offer my own cautions to the head of the piano department and put the ball squarely in his/her camp. Let the professors and assistant professors hash it out. And if they vote for the outside source, turn it into a positive by enthusiastically embracing what you "expect" to be a valuable learning experience. If it goes bad.... well then you've learned what not to do, and you have emolsifried yourself from all blame responsibilty ahead of time. Cheers RicB ............... List: I have a Yamaha CFIII here at UM. Because of a political situation too complex to describe, an adjunct piano faculty here wants to bring in his "personal technician" to voice and regulate the piano. He wants to use an alcohol/water solution on the hammers to voice. The last piano he did this on (a Kawai KG-2D) was turned to mush, and I am concerned that is what would happen to our 9' Yamaha. Do any of you have experience using this solution on Yamaha hammers, and have they been good or bad? Of course, I'm not happy about them bringing in this other "tech", but it may be unavoidable due to the politics. Thanks for any input. Jeff Stickney University of Montana
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC