There's a standard joke at the Cincinnati Symphony is that they tune to A-441 and play at 442. The orchestra DOES tend to get sharper as they go along and I think this is a very common natural tendency. A kind of "pushing the envelope"...finding the edge where excitement begins to become unmusical. It is definitely better to err on the side of being a little sharp rather than the other way around and this is possibly what collectively pushes the pitch upwards. I never let the piano get below A-441 and tune it with a lot of stretch. There is a natural system of checks and balances in the orchestra and the percussionists have their bars set at 442 because they have to. They set the upper limit. I have had a few discussions with the harpist (who sits almost inside the piano when it is in the orchestra) about how she copes with the stretch on the piano. She (as almost all harpists do) tunes with a strobe tuner. She just tunes it to A-442, no stretch. There is currently a small controversy swirling about the celesta because of an upcoming recording session. The orchestra's celesta is an ancient rattletrap and they've finally decided it sounds flat... Despite all this, the general intonation of the orchestra is excellent. They make the necessary musical adjustments as they play and it somehow works out. Eric Wolfley, RPT Supervising Piano Technician College-Conservatory of Music University of Cincinnati -----Original Message----- From: Fred S Sturm [mailto:fssturm@unm.edu] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:01 AM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] A440 percussion On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:46:09 EDT Wimblees@aol.com wrote: > > I found out about this a couple of months ago when the >harp player told me > she tunes to 442 to be in tune with the percussion >instruments. But the oboe > plays 440, and no one has asked me to tune the piano to >442. > >For those orchestras that tune to 440, but use mallet >instruments tuned to > 442, doesn't the conductor complain these instruments >aren't in tune with the > rest of the orchestra? > > This get's me to wondering if those who seem to be so >worried about it, > really know if the orchestra is tuned to 442 or 440? >Personally I think it is > just a case of "I want to be different", and/or "I am >sooooo good, that I can > tell the difference", when perhaps they really can't. > > Wim > > Willem Blees, RPT > Piano Technician > School of Music > University of Alabama > Well, Wim, do remember that most orchestra members have some kind of electronic tuner these days. Not up to our standards in accuracy, but definitely capable of discerning the difference between 440 and 442. So virtually any orchestra member could know with a fair degree of precision what the pitch is, regardless of the precision of their "perfect pitch." Furthermore, any wind player would be able to tell just by how the instrument responds in trying to match pitch, and string players are well attuned to how their instruments sound (timbre) at various pitches. I think you would find that the vast majority of professional orchestra members would know quite well what pitch the piano had been tuned to. As for the audience or the critics, that's a different question <g> Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico _______________________________________________ caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC