This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment How mortifying! All this while I've been maligning a whole genre, ignoring improvements too suble to notice. I had not noticed that these things were fanning their ribs and morphing their scales as they pulled themselves out of the primordial ooze by their dog-legged bridle wires & synthetic buckskin. :-) I always knew evolutionary theory had some flaws! Otto ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Jolly To: College and University Technicians Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:35 PM Subject: RE: Baldwin 743 question Hi Paul, Sorry you are wrong, 243HP is an entirely different scale, Ask Del. <G> That model has a fanned rib configuration, plus other subtle improvements. The 743 scale has parallel ribs two small damper blocks, vs tri damper blocks.. Oh well?????? Regards Roger At 06:06 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote: Complete correct term is HP-243. Paul Kupelian SUNY Oswego (ret.) -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Otto Keyes Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:47 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: Baldwin 743 question I agree with your last comment Mark. However, I always thought they were 243's (or perhaps deserving of an even lower numeric designation). From whence came this 500 point elevation? For me, these always bore the designation of "Bald-swine". Only redeeming feature is the lid prop -- but even that gets in the way of tuning. Otto Please pardon the abscence of optimism, but I find servicing the 743's, beyond tuning, tends to underwhelm even the most meager expectations. Mark Cramer, Brandon University ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/2c/a6/9e/97/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC