This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Vince- Never having learned calculus, I don't know how to work a formula like = this. Assuming that I have -Strikeweight continuity within Stanwood's suggested range -Frontweight continuity within Stanwood's ceiling -Even and acceptable DW & UW How can I use this formula to improve action performance? Thanks! Ed Sutton ----- Original Message -----=20 From: madelyn mrykalo=20 To: College and University Technicians=20 Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:56 AM Subject: Re: Touch weight Hi- Of course you can have acceptable DW's & UW's and at the same time = have a wide range of moments of inertia, some which may be acceptable = and some which may not be. Or the front weights could be too high. = That's why I don't think UW/DW alone tells us enough about how the = action "feels". =20 =20 Here is a formula for moment of inertia (I): I=3D m1r12 + m2r22 + m3r32 + ... + mnrn2 =20 =20 Where m is the mass and r (radius) is the distance that the mass is = from the balance hole of the key. The key itself has some moment of = inertia too. =20 So the action in question (Wim's D) might weigh off acceptably (DW and = UW), but also may have a too heavy a front weight, and/or moment of = inertia. =20 Stanwood has come up with a good standard of front weights. Moment of = inertia standards are a little more ambiguous at this point. More = importantly is that the moments be reasonably smooth from key to key. Brian is right. Brian Lawson <lawsonic@bdmail.co.za> wrote: Hi, I think he is referring to the English language with use of a = virgule and not a division sign 3 : a mark / used typically to denote "or" (as in and/or), "and or" = (as in straggler/deserter), or "per" (as in feet/second) -- called also = slash, solidus, virgule Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne"=20 To: "College and University Technicians"=20 Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Touch weight madelyn mrykalo wrote: > HI-More telling than downweight/upweight is moment of = inertia/front > weight (which are two different things). UW/DW will not, in and of > itself, tell much of anything about the action's feel. > I think you want to explain this a bit further for us. How exactly = are you ariving at ! the moment of inertia (for the key) and what does dividing that by FW tell us exactly ? Cheers RicB Vince Mrykalo University of Utah -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/44/69/aa/03/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC