Richard, One of these days, I'll get all this straight in my mind!!!!!! :-) >Depends a bit on the hammers themselves for me, but usually I end up >with the lightest shanks for the bass... lightest of these at key >number 1. Then the heaviest of shanks starts at the lowest tenor note. > >I weigh hammers as well ahead of time so if there is any of these that >for whatever reasons are lots heavier or lighter then its neighbors I >can match that with an appropriate shank to sort of even out a bit. So you're referring now to the type of overall weight I mentioned in my original post? Not SW? In other words, basically if my lightest s/f weight was 6.8g, you'd put that one on note #1 and graduate it on up, getting heavier, to the break? Then at that point, if my heaviest s/f was 8.2g, you'd put that one at the first tenor note and graduate that on up, getting lighter, until the thinned shanks start and begin those with the lightest, getting heavier on up to #88? I understand about the S/W and maybe doing some matching with hammer weight and can do that but it seems, as I "think" you are saying here, that the overall s/f weight should also enter into the general placement of the shanks before the hammers are glued on. Am I correct or am I just still trying to see through muddy water? :-) Avery >"Vincent E. Mrykalo" wrote: > >> Do any of yous guys use the heavier shanks up in the treble, and go >> lighter as you go down? (Of course, with the thinned shanks start >> with the heaviest at 88 to lightest, then the non thinned ones the > > same). >> > >-- >Richard Brekne >RPT, N.P.T.F. >UiB, Bergen, Norway >mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no >http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html > > >_______________________________________________ >caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC