Hi Ron, Why not construct a piano with every other note on the piano bridge in a Wapin configuration? This would allow us to examine neighboring notes to see if a note without Wapin sounds any different from a note with Wapin. The first attempt at such an endeavor was actually done at Baldwin around 1996. Baldwin took a Chickering 410. The bridge was constructed before the assembly with an every other note configuration. Baldwin had no real R & D department at the time. The bridge was made in the factory by me, Michael Wathen, and was later installed on a piano as it came through the assembly line. It sat finished for many months in the Truman factory while the management tried to figure out how to test it. About six months after it was completed it was sent to the Cincinnati corporate showroom and placed on the showroom floor amidst fifty to sixty other new pianos for sale. It sat there untuned and unattended for several weeks until I found out it was there. I pushed the management to evaluate it. They agreed that I would go to the showroom and spend a day regulating and tuning. No voicing was allowed. The next day a group of Baldwin employees checked it out. According to the testimony the listened to the every other note configuration. Everyone agreed that they could hear no difference. So the whole project died right then and there. There was no effort made to test anything. During the same period, I made my own every other note piano as a technician at University of Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music. I modified a Baldwin M. I used a HP Dynamic Signal Analyzer to look at the data among the differing notes. I found nothing that set the Wapin notes apart from the non-Wapin notes. Nor could I distinguish anything aurally. I dropped this every other note approach as a dead end. In retrospect I think of all the improvements made by piano designers and builders throughout the centuries. Very few have supporting clear scientific evidence that quantifies the effect of whatever improvement is in question. Where are downbearing experiments. How about an every other note downbearing experiment. I am willing to bet that you would get anything worthwhile in the way of empirical scientific justification. Think of an every other note Steinway hammers versus Abel hammers, or Roslau versus Mapes wire. Finally, I rest assured that many efforts by a multitude of experts over many years has failed to produce the scientific justification of why a Stradivarius sounds better than any other violin of expert craftsmanship. Michael Wathen Wapin Co., LLP Ron Nossaman wrote: > >>Hello, > >> The few Wapinized pianos I have played excelled in both power, > >> sustain, and especially clarity. > >>-Mike Jorgensen > > > >But the unrepentant objectivist asks, "Where is the control in the > >experiment? What would these same pianos, rebuilt by the same rebuilder, > >have sounded like with conventional bridge pinning? > > > >David Skolnik > > That's always been the question - hence the suggestions from various folk > for a piano with every other unison Wapinized. > > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC