---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Ron, At 07:08 AM 12/8/99 -0800, you wrote: >Hmm. My colleague, the imitable (who says there's a God?) Grijalva, >insists on providing our shop pantry with lacquer bearing the *least* >amount of solids. Is this a contradiction? Before arriving at this august >institution, I hadn't given much thought to lacquer composition. The >presence (or lack) of solids must bear on how hard the stuff cures, yes? Ah, yes....another area in which Bob and I, err, ah, disagree. No contradiction, per se - difference in style. I learned lacquer (among other useful things, some related to pianos) from Bill Hupfer and Franz Mohr over a long period of time, and have seen no reason to substantively deviate from their instruction. (FWIW, both of them preferred at the time, when any hardener was needed at all, shellac. I used it for a long time...basically until customer/technician complaints about "discoloration" became too onerous. Never seemed to affect the tone adversely...) This really does open up the whole Pandora's Box issue of what/why/when/how much/etc does one use. Some pianos "want" a very thin, light application. Others simply demand being loaded to the eyes with the heaviest stuff you can find. My inherited preference for automotive lacquer stems from the usage - that is, Bill and Franz both spent most of their time working on instruments that had to be heard above orchestras from the back of a 3000 seat hall. Since this was in the days when people still knew what pianos were supposed to sound like, loading up the hammers with plastic goo was not an option. The resulting sound is simply too thin, too reedy sounding, and too lacking in fundamental to carry as other than a "splat"...doesn't even qualify as what we used to call "glassy". In any event, what most technicians seem to miss is that no voicing technique, however brutal or subtle, can bring out what is not there to begin with...one can make it louder or softer, more or less harsh...but, bad tone is built in before the name goes on (to paraphrase the old Zenith commercial). > >Sad - maybe I'll just have to pour this out somewhere EPA-safe.... > >Safe from EPA scrutiny? From your lips to my ears. Cheers! Best regards to all. Horace ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/0d/46/c2/0e/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC