This device was not intended to set static key weight. It was intended only to help establish the correct position of the capstan by optimising the key-to-hammer-lever ratio. -- ddf --------------------------- Ron Torrella wrote: > I've done a little bit of experimenting with capstan location using a gig > similar to the one Del described. (See below for a description.) The > results are interesting. > > NOTE: This is another B [#352489] that has the same leverage problem. > Renner wips and shanks, NY hammers, Pratt-Read keyboard, "accelerated > action" (read "lotsa lead!"). Essentially, the same keyboard as the one I > mentioned before, only this one has Renner parts. The key bushing are new > and eased correctly. The centers on the shanks and wips are loose -- > probably will be re-pinned because they're outside of "shop tolerance." > The piano was restrung this summer, oversized pins, original pinblock. > Given that small amount of background.... > > I removed capstans at No.s 1, 20, 21, 37, 51, 68 & 88, but because I had a > short amount of time to work with, I only managed to get through the first > five. On #1, the original capstan location downweight was 64, up was 36. I > moved the capstan location 1/8" toward the balance rail and got 60 down, > 34 up. Not bad, but not close enough to ideal for me. Note #20, moved > 1/8" only got me to 59 and 31. Note #21 was a distaster. Had to move the > capstan 1/4" and that *only* got me down to 59 and 30. Note #37 went down > to 60 and 38 with 1/8" movement. And note #51 only got to 53 and 28 at > 1/8". > > Can't move capstans any more than 3/16" without the capstan contacting > wood. 1/8" would be fine, except it means drilling out the capstan holes > *oversized*, plugging and redrilling. If I didn't oversize the old holes, > drilling new ones would be straddling old and new wood. If I used pine > plugs (not dowels....plugs cut from scrapped keyboards), I *may* be able > to get away with "normal" sized plugs, but there's still a glue joint to > deal with. (Have I started splitting hairs yet?) > > I'm contemplating the option of a combination of things; move the capstans > no more than 3/16" *and* swap small keyleads for medium or large ones. The > net result would be a lighter touch (improved leverage), but a slightly > heavier keyboard (on the order of 150-200grams or 5-7 lbs, overall, is a > guess). > > The other option is to install those "turbo" wippens from Renner. I tried > a few of those and they're pretty slick. The manhours involved with > re-pinning and regulating those wippens would be about the same as the > current wippens (I don't think that stuff has been done yet). > > Anyone wanna hazard a guess at which route will take longer? > > Ron Torrella, RPT > Piano Technician > University of Michigan > School of Music
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC